Ferenc Wagner <wf...@niif.hu> writes: > Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org> writes: > >> On 16/12/15 00:12, Ferenc Wagner wrote: >> >>> Niko Tyni <nt...@debian.org> writes: >>> >>>> So the proper way out seems to be a separate libdlm source package, as >>>> discussed in [1]. Ferenc, do I understand right that a new pacemaker >>>> package is a blocker for this? Is that because the current pacemaker >>>> would be broken by the libdlm update? >>> >>> No: the new DLM package depends on the new Pacemaker package. I'm >>> already testing them, there's only some cleanup remaining before they >>> can be uploaded. Both will go through NEW though, so it will take some >>> time. >> >> I can speed things up if they block a transition... Got an eta for this? > > That sounds useful! I expect to get pacemaker_1.1.13-1 ready for upload > today, taking some shortcuts.
Now the Perl transition is rolling and I can't build Pacemaker anymore, because some of its build dependencies are broken. Is there still a reason to hurry the uploads? -- Regards, Feri.