Hi Niko,
Niko Tyni wrote:
> The alternative is to remove it from testing.
Indeed.
> The changes between 1.20 and 1.21 are minimal, those can't be the
> reason for the failure. Probably either changes in perl or libc
> broke it.
>
> I expect 1.20 fails in the same way at least on sid, and probably
> in testing too.
I see.
> I've made some progress on it fwiw, and it seems to be something with
> two print statements in different modules getting the same opcode address
> on the perl side, therefore hashing down to a same hash key and getting
> counted as one. Will update the upstream bug when I've got.to the bottom
> of it.
Yay, thanks! (I'm subscribed to the upstream bug, btw.)
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <[email protected]>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
