* Scott Talbert: " Re: [tryton-debian] python-profitbricks-client: Please use a maintained soap library instead of deprecated python-suds." (Sun, 3 Jan 2016 20:59:04 -0500 (EST)):
Hi Scott, > On Wed, 9 Dec 2015, Scott Talbert wrote: > > >> After looking again to the current state of suds-jurko (which is no more > >> fully > >> API compatible), the result of the conversation at DebConf today between > >> Benjamin and me is: > >> > >> * Benjamin wants to try first to port profitbrick packages to pysimplesoap, > >> which now has hit testing. > >> * After that he will decide, if he wants to take over maintenance of the > >> current suds package to do a drop-in with suds-jurko or create a separate > >> suds-jurko package or if at lest he doesn't need suds at all. > > > > Hello all, > > > > Is there any new news on the above? Benjamin, have you decided to continue > > maintenance of suds or are you going with pysimplesoap? > > Hello all, > > Given the non-response to the above, would anyone object to me just taking > over maintenance of python-suds? Indeed there are no news from Benjamin. As pointed out in [1] I don't agree, that packaging suds-jurko as a drop-in for python-suds is a sustainable solution. Nevertheless I won't get into the way, if you declare that you still want to take over the maintenance of python-suds. Please tell, how you intend to maintain python-suds. Looking at your packages [2] I see, that none seems to be maintained in a VCS, which would probably a good thing to do, i.e. where would you like the current repos of suds to be moved? Once the pending questions are clarified I will do a final release of python-suds from my side to declare the change of the maintainer. Best, Mathias [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=810007#12 {2] https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?email=swt%40techie.net -- Mathias Behrle PGP/GnuPG key availabable from any keyserver, ID: 0x8405BBF6
pgpsghacLJvvx.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
