Hi, out of curiosity: where is the harm in a "useless" alternative dependency that enables people to easily build backports without tinkering with the package?
Michael On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Tobias Frost <t...@debian.org> wrote: > Am Samstag, den 09.01.2016, 22:55 -0500 schrieb Yaroslav Halchenko: > > > > > > but ok -- will list libpng-dev as the first and alternative libpng12 > > and will see how it goes > > > > *sigh* ok, even if the libpng12-dev is superficious. (It creates more > work, as I will file a bug to remove it once the transistion have > started and you'll need another sourceful upload.) > -- Michael Hanke http://mih.voxindeserto.de
