On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 12:46:37PM -0500, Neil Roeth wrote: > Thanks for digging into this and finding that the bug still exists if > --disable-dtddecl is dropped. I'll also keep looking into it and see what I > can find.
I looked a bit further into it before I had to let it go due to lack of time; the damage (whatever it is) happens when the very first DTD is attempted parsed, in the init phase, in doInit() very early on (in the error-checking if, it seems). HTH :-) > As for the "insanely complex input layer" and "standard" - this code was > probably written a decade ago, so my guess is that what is standard now might > not even have existed in most C++ compilers back then. :-) Yes, I saw that -- but they're still using templates for their own string class, so they can't have been _that_ much pre-STL :-) /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
