On 2016-01-14 04:53:31, Danny Edel wrote:
> Hi Antoine,
>
> On 01/13/2016 07:50 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>> The readme is not quite accurate: *some* borg versions are actually
>> compatible across the network. It's only on the 0.29 boundary that there
>> is a problem.
>
> Is this[1] wording acceptable? Then I would prepare it for upload as
> 0.29.0-3, closing the bug.
Much better, thanks!
>> It also refers to a non-existent backport, but i guess we can trust this
>> will come to fruitition soon. :)
>
> I was hoping that too, so this may be a bit optimistic. But I hope in
> case there is none, a user would report this as a bug (i.e. communicate
> with us) rather than installing in a non-managed directory.
Fine with me. Anyways, the timeline for the backport is "real soon
now"... so this is minor.
a.
--
Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things that
you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines.
Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails.
Explore. Dream. Discover.
- Mark Twain
