On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 23:04:21 -0500 James McCoy <[email protected]> wrote: > At the time, this meant I had to choose one and I went with Python 2 due > to the much higher prevalence of plugins targeting it. While Python 3 > has gained a lot of ground since then and it's much more easy to write > code that works in both versions, my understanding is that the > RTLD_GLOBAL issue still exists. This means I still need to choose one > version and, while it's more of a toss up now, I think Python 2 is still > the right call here.
Do you think it is still the right call or has the time come to switch to Python 3? Your call is now almost 2 years old and if you'd like Stretch to have Python 3 support, now seems like a good time to make the switch so there's plenty of time to catch and fix bugs if the switch would trigger that. Cheers, Diederik
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
