control: reopen -1 On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 11:36 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System <ow...@bugs.debian.org> wrote: > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > which was filed against the src:libgda5 package: > > #788729: [src:libgda5] Some sources are not included in your package > > It has been closed by Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org>. > > Their explanation is attached below along with your original report. > If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a > better one in a separate message then please contact Michael Biebl > <bi...@debian.org> by > replying to this email. > > > -- > 788729: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=788729 > Debian Bug Tracking System > Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> > To: 788729-d...@bugs.debian.org > Cc: > Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 23:34:19 +0100 > Subject: Re: [src:libgda5] Some sources are not included in your package > Version: 4.0.2-1 > On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 16:50:52 +0000 bastien =?ISO-8859-1?Q?ROUCARI=C8S?= > <roucaries.bastien+deb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Package: src:libgda5 >> Version: 5.2.2-2 >> user: lintian-ma...@debian.org >> usertags: source-is-missing >> severity: serious >> X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@debian.org >> >> Hi, >> >> Your package includes some files that seem to lack sources >> in prefered forms of modification: >> >> tools/jquery.js >> >> According to Debian Free Software Guidelines [1] (DFSG) #2: >> "The program must include source code, and must allow distribution >> in source code as well as compiled form." >> >> In some cases this could also constitute a license violation for some >> copyleft licenses such as the GNU GPL. (While sometimes the licence >> allows not to ship the source, the DFSG always mandates source code.) >> >> In order to solve this problem, you could: >> 1. add the source files to "debian/missing-sources" directory. >> 2. repack the origin tarball and add the missing source files to it. >> >> Both way satisfy the requirement to ship all source code. The second option >> might be preferable due to the following reasons [2]: >> - Upstream can do it too and you could even supply a patch to them, thus >> full filling our social contract [3], see particularly §2. >> - If source and non-source are in different locations, ftpmasters may >> miss the source and (needlessly) reject the package. >> - The source isn't duplicated in every .diff.gz/.debian.tar.* (though >> this only really matters for larger sources). >> >> You could also ask debian...@lists.debian.org or #debian-qa for more >> guidance. >> >> [1] https://www.debian.org/social_contract.en.html#guidelines >> [2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736873#8 >> [3] https://www.debian.org/social_contract > > Closing, false positive: > > libgda4 (4.0.2-1) unstable; urgency=low > > > - Don't ship our own copy of jquery.js, link to the one in libjs-jquery > instead. Thus depend on libjs-jquery. >
No see http://sources.debian.net/src/libgda4/4.0.12-1/tools/jquery.js/ Corrected at build time see debian/rules, but you need a repack Thanks > -- > Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the > universe are pointed away from Earth? > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "bastien ROUCARIÈS" <roucaries.bastien+deb...@gmail.com> > To: sub...@bugs.debian.org > Cc: > Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2015 16:50:52 +0000 > Subject: [src:libgda5] Some sources are not included in your package > Package: src:libgda5 > Version: 5.2.2-2 > user: lintian-ma...@debian.org > usertags: source-is-missing > severity: serious > X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@debian.org > > Hi, > > Your package includes some files that seem to lack sources > in prefered forms of modification: > > tools/jquery.js > > According to Debian Free Software Guidelines [1] (DFSG) #2: > "The program must include source code, and must allow distribution > in source code as well as compiled form." > > In some cases this could also constitute a license violation for some > copyleft licenses such as the GNU GPL. (While sometimes the licence > allows not to ship the source, the DFSG always mandates source code.) > > In order to solve this problem, you could: > 1. add the source files to "debian/missing-sources" directory. > 2. repack the origin tarball and add the missing source files to it. > > Both way satisfy the requirement to ship all source code. The second option > might be preferable due to the following reasons [2]: > - Upstream can do it too and you could even supply a patch to them, thus > full filling our social contract [3], see particularly §2. > - If source and non-source are in different locations, ftpmasters may > miss the source and (needlessly) reject the package. > - The source isn't duplicated in every .diff.gz/.debian.tar.* (though > this only really matters for larger sources). > > You could also ask debian...@lists.debian.org or #debian-qa for more > guidance. > > [1] https://www.debian.org/social_contract.en.html#guidelines > [2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736873#8 > [3] https://www.debian.org/social_contract