Hi Pietro, Thanks for the quick reply!
On 19/01/2016 23:41, Pietro Abate wrote: > > This change was indeed intentional. Thanks for the confirmation! > > Mehdi, where are these places in the code that still expect "src:" ? > I've removed this prefix from all the yaml output. I didn't really > check if some input require the package to be prefixed with "src:", > but it shouldn't be... > Only did a quick grep: % git grep -n "\"src:" **/*.ml applications/deb-buildcheck.ml:182: let (name,filter) = Debian.Debutil.debvpkg to_cudf (("src:"^n,a),c) in deb/debcudf.ml:343: if String.starts_with pkg#name "src:" then deb/sources.ml:235: let sn = CudfAdd.encode ("src:"^(CudfAdd.get_property "source" binpkg)) in deb/tests.ml:875: "any/native", "src:source1", returns [ deb/tests.ml:883: "stage1", "src:source2", returns [ deb/tests.ml:892: "indep", "src:source3", returns [ Are those occurences expected? > For this release, I also re-wrote the yaml printer from scratch and > there might still be a few problems here and there... In particular > dependency chains, when there is more then one path from a package to > a dependency problem (missing package or conflict), are not all > explicitly printed/expanded as before. Instead I just print one path. > > Please let me know how I can help. This tool is for the debian > community :) I'll be at fosdem at the end of the month, if you want to > have a face to face chat. > > p > -- M.