Hello again.

On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 10:07:03PM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> There's one question on my mind though, shouldn't the upgrade case
> be versioned? eg. so in additional future releases you don't try to
> divert when you've already diverted. You only want the diversion to
> happen once when upgrading to this exact version you're preparing now.

One minor correction, we should ofcourse not check which version
we're upgrading *to*. The check should be if we're upgrading *from*
a version << $FIRSTFIXED~. I think the example in policy has this right
so check that out instead of listening to me. ;)

Andreas Henriksson

Reply via email to