Package: rpl
Version: 1.5.2
Severity: important
Tags: patch
The developer used 'force' instead of 'opts.force'
--- /tmp/rpl 2006-01-10 12:44:19.000000000 -0300
+++ /usr/bin/rpl 2006-01-10 11:47:34.000000000 -0300
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@
sys.stderr.write("\nrpl: Unable to set
owner/group/perms of %s"
% filename)
sys.stderr.write("\nrpl: Error: %s" % e)
- if force:
+ if opts.force:
sys.stderr.write("\nrpl: WARNING: New
owner/group/perms may not match!\n\n")
else:
sys.stderr.write("\nrpl: SKIPPING %s!\n\n" %
filename)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-cko2
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages rpl depends on:
ii python 2.3.5-3 An interactive high-level object-o
rpl recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
