On 02/09/2016 08:14 PM, Rhonda D'Vine wrote: > Unfortunately unsatisfyable recommends are a policy violation though, > and even while I understand the sentiments of not wanting to have to > reupload wine to add it, I don't see a way around this. [...] >> Rhonda, do you see any flexibility in interpreting the policy for this >> case? If not, I'll do something like > > Unfortunately I don't see it, it's a clear must requirement and there > for very specific reasons, to keep main untainted from non-free > packages. > > So yes, seperating the issue of that it might help to where to find > gecko to install it personally, and lowering the recommends to suggests > could definitely be tackled seperately.
Thanks Rhonda. Imo the dependency on libwine-gecko-xxx should stay a recommends, a suggests imo doesn't meet the importance of Gecko in Wine. So I'll commit a change to remove (comment) that from wine and wine-development. Greets jre