* Frank Küster: > #218195 is about the woeful copyright file, not the woeful copyright of > a particular file... What we really need to do is to sort out which > parts of teTeX are under which license, and document that clearly (and > remove if necessary), and to that end collecting information about > GFDLed stuff is important. Therefore I'd like to have the information > in that bug, too.
Okay, I understand. > I guess the license is GPL-incompatible, but DFSG-free. And *that* is > not a practical problem, since nobody would want to reuse the code from > tex.web in a new project. But pdfTeX does, and it claims to be GPLed.
