Hi, On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 12:25:31AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 17.02.2016 23:36, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 07:17:31PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > That they are installed is intended, though. > > thanks, this assumptions breaks any builders which don't yet use automatic > dbgsym package generation. How big is this file that it can't be shipped in > the library package?
Not big, but why should it be shipped in the library package? It's not needed there. It's for debugging only, and if you want that, you want the debugging symbols anyway - which is what -dbg(sym) is for. Regards, Rene
