On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 9:53 PM, Christophe <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > Sorry for the delay. I re-checked, and both packages were *not* installed! I > gave a try with busybox-static and it does fix the problem. I also gave a try > setting BUSYBOX=n in the initramfs.conf file, which also works. > > So this makes me wonder: > - if it is a (new) design choice to use Busybox, shouldn't it be added as a > dependency? > - if not, shouldn't the variable be automatically set, with something like: > > if [ -x /bin/busybox ]; then > BUSYBOX=y > else > BUSYBOX=n > fi
As Ben always says, please read the NEWS. If you didn't while upgrading initramfs-tools, it's placed under /usr/share/doc/initramfs-tools/ Cheers, -- Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo PGP/GPG: 17B3ACB1
