Version: 3.0.20b-3 On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 05:54:24PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Filip Van Raemdonck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > clone 308812 -1 -2 > > retitle -1 winbind - missing dependency on samba-common > > retitle -2 winbind - missing required directory /var/run/samba > > severity -1 serious > > severity -2 serious > > stop
> 1) I don't really see the rationale in cloning the bug. > 2) winbind already depends on samba-common, since version 3.0.20b-3 > So, imho, #308812 should be closed (actually I should have closed it > when we released 3.0.20b-3, this was omitted). And the new bug you > opened should be as well. > > There is also a second bug which makes winbind fail even if samba-common > > ís installed: neither winbind nor samba-common create a required > > /var/run/samba directory. > That one is correct. However, I don't think it deserves "serious" as > it makes winbind unusable *only* when samba is not installed which is > not the most common case. It is an RC policy violation in the sense that the winbind package is missing a dependency on a package required for its use. (Removing the need for such a dependency is a perfectly valid way to fix the bug, of course.) > So, I hereby propose: > 1) close #308812 and #347584 with "Version: 3.0.20b-3 Yes, closing 308812 since this dependency has now been added. > 2) lower #347585 to important > I don't do it right now because I really want to understand why you > cloned the bug. I believe this one should still be left open, and at the present severity. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
