On Mon, 2016-03-07 at 23:24 +1030, Arthur Marsh wrote: > Package: samba-dsdb-modules > Version: 2:4.3.5+dfsg-2 > Severity: important > > Dear Maintainer, > > *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where > appropriate *** > > * What led up to the situation? > > Attempting to upgrade samba including samba-dsdb-modules on Debian > unstable > x86-64 to version 2:4.3.5+dfsg-2 > > * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or > ineffective)? > > samba-dsdb-modules 2:4.3.5+dfsg-2 x86-64 depends on: > > libldb1 < 2:1.1.25~ > and > libldb1 > 2:1.1.24~ > > * What was the outcome of this action? > > I had to remove package samba-dsdb-modules to upgrade the rest of > samba > > * What outcome did you expect instead? > > What happened on i386 architecture: > > libldb1 < 2:1.1.27~ > and > libldb1 > 2:1.1.26~ > > (Package libldb1 version 2:1.1.26-1 appears in both x86-64 and i386 > architectures in Debian)
As background: samba-dsdb-modules depends strictly on the version of LDB it was built against, because it uses an unstable internal API (the module API has no ABI promises) I realise this doesn't help you, but I hope it clarifies things, Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett https://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team https://samba.org Samba Development and Support, Catalyst IT https://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba
