correct link is here http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-sdl/packages/libsdl1.2.git/commit/?id=5442bf696a96f7e0453d0a0cf75eb3a042d5f2b5
the -2 wasn't committed on git, so I imported the dsc and moved to a -3 entry. sorry for the noise, G. On Wed, 9 Mar 2016 12:10:41 +0100 Gianfranco Costamagna <[email protected]> wrote: > control: tags -1 patch > control: tags -1 pending > > Hi Manuel, since this is part of a transition, and I expect it to become RC > soon, and Ubuntu already had the patch > (and disabled the support long time ago), I took the liberty to fix and > upload on DELAYED/2 > > the patch is there > http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-sdl/packages/libsdl1.2.git/commit/?id=957aea45da8d0c26c72535d4db5b9790a90e58a5 > > and a successful build is here > http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/libsdl1.2/1.2.15+dfsg1-2/buildlog > > (let me know if I can reschedule to delayed/0) > > cheers, > > Gianfranco > > On Thu, 3 Mar 2016 18:06:44 +0000 "Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo" > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Javier, > > > > 2016-02-27 18:14 Javier Cantero: > > >Package: libsdl1.2debian > > >Version: 1.2.15+dfsg1-2 > > >Severity: wishlist > > > > > >Dear Maintainer, > > > > > >Due to the current status of DirectFB (the project seems dead) and also > > >the status of the debian package (currently unfit for release), can I > > >suggest that future releases drop the dependency by not compiling SDL > > >1.2 with DirectFB support? > > > > > >Thank you for your time and consideration. > > > > I had some hope that we wouldn't have to touch libsdl1.2 much, but the > > migration to libsdl2 is not going as fast as I would like / expect. > > > > So I guess that it's better to drop this dependency at some point before > > the freeze. > > > > If this becomes more high priority for some reason, e.g. because of a > > pending RM of libdirectfb, please let us know. > > > > > > Cheers. > > -- > > Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <[email protected]> > > > > >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
