Oh, all that cruft got through. Tried the templates. Didn't work. Need them
now.
At the airport. Will touch tonight.
On Mar 10, 2016 7:07 PM, "Martin Michlmayr" <t...@hpe.com> wrote:
> * Stephen Dennis <brazilof...@gmail.com> [2016-03-10 18:07]:
> > * I did not add dh-autoreconf because as you say, the root problem is a
> > config.{sub,guess} was stale. Unfortunately, there is code in
> autoconf.h.in
> > from a previous autoconf.h file which running autoreconf would step on.
>
> Ah, I see. But if you're not running the tool, why do you close the
> bug? Oh, because you say that the autoconf scripts have been updated
> in the tar ball.
>
> > * Yeah, 2.10 is out there and it works well. The problems like
> autoconf.h.in
>
> Ok, makes sense.
>
> Anyway, in the new version, we now have:
>
> tinymux-2.6.5.34/debian/autoreconf.after
> tinymux-2.6.5.34/debian/autoreconf.before
> tinymux-2.6.5.34/debian/patches/deleteme
>
> which looks like cruft to me.
>
> Also, is tinymux-2.6.5.34/debian/patches/autoreconf-templates.diff
> necessary and if so do you need to build-depend on something?
> --
> Martin Michlmayr
> Linux for HPE Helion, Hewlett Packard Enterprise
>
