Hi, I have implemented ip-freebind socket option for Unbound. Thank you for the report, I did not know that it could be useful (next to the ip-transparent option).
Best regards, Wouter On 01/03/16 21:00, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Robert Edmonds <[email protected]> [2016-03-01 20:14 +0100]: >> I like the first suggestion even more: >> >> Watch rtnetlink and react properly to network configuration changes >> as they happen. This is usually the nicest solution, but not always >> the easiest. >> >> But that is significantly more development work. > > Would this enable me to say that unbound should just listen on iface > "eth0"? > >> By the way, have you tried "ip-transparent: yes"? According to > > No! > >> I wonder if IP_FREEBIND would actually be a better fit for the >> functionality described in unbound.conf than IP_TRANSPARENT, since >> unbound.conf doesn't mention any of the proxying properties of >> IP_TRANSPARENT. > > I agree. > > Meanwhile, I found that adding > > dad-attempts 200 > > (standard ifupdown feature) > > to the iface inet6 stanza in /etc/network/interface would make ifup > wait up to 20 seconds for the DAD to complete… and block meanwhile. > This is enough for my interface to come up with a non-tentative > address and so by the time boot resumes, the address is fully > configured. >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
