20.05.2015, 20:43, Ryan Tandy kirjoitti: > Hi dkg, > > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:58:08PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> If the work to switch openldap to NSS is strictly because of licensing >> concerns that have been resolved since the bug was opened, please >> reconsider the switch. > > I don't think anyone intends to switch the default libldap or slapd to > nss. I personally would argue against causing that kind of upgrade pain. > There's still a possibility of providing an alternate libldap built with > nss, but that would take some work, and it sounds like freeipa upstream > are moving away from needing it anyway. So this bug will probably just > go away eventually.
Another thing is that folks using just 389ds can't replicate it (LP: #1564179) because of the same reason.. so having a libldap built against nss would still be useful for some. -- t
