On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 03:34:31PM +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote: > On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 01:40:47AM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote: > [...] > > Also, any packages depending > > on aspell-dictionary will unfortunately have to be updated to use > > aspell6-dictionary instead. These packages are: abiword-common, > > sylpheed, sylpheed-claws, ekg, ekg2. > > Sorry for the long delay. > > ekg and ekg2 are in: > http://people.debian.org/~porridge/aspell-transition/ > > Two things: > > 1) I have decided to keep: > > Suggests: aspell-pl | aspell6-dictionary, sms-pl > > Rather than the suggested: > > Suggests: aspell-pl, sms-pl > > Because I think that the latter might cause some package management > tools to nag the user to install aspell-pl even if she already > installed some other dictionary. Just a theory, though, not tested.
Note that libaspell15, which ekg links against, already Recommends: aspell-en | aspell6-dictionary. I'd think that relationship would override the aspell-pl | aspell6-dictionary one, so the user would get aspell-en by default and probably not notice aspell-pl at all. It may make more sense to just use the Suggests: aspell-pl, ... > 2) If possible, please wait with the upload until ekg 1:1.5+20050212-1 > (uploaded today, urgency=medium, so that should last about six days > IIRC) enters testing. Iff you want to do the upload earlier, then > please let me know, and I'll provide 1:1.5+20050212-2 with increased > urgency. Since ekg only has a weak relationship (Suggests) on aspell-dictionary/aspell6-dictionary, the upload of aspell 0.60 shouldn't have any effect on ekg's candidancy for testing, provided you've linked against the libaspell15 currently in testing. -- Society is never going to make any progress until we all learn to pretend to like each other. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
