Samuel Thibault, on Mon 04 Apr 2016 10:34:04 +0200, wrote: > Martin Quinson, on Wed 30 Mar 2016 23:07:45 +0200, wrote: > > The r1430 is already almost 2 years old, and we start advising to our users > > to > > not go for the debian package but for the svn version. This is somehow > > suboptimal, and I'd be thankful if you could update the package at some > > point. > > I'm wondering: what makes you request to use the svn version? AFAIK > The svn contains only 3 new commits: an option for using qt5 (which > we already use in Debian), a fix for segfault at application closing, > and a fix for a "crash when doing stats on states which don't have a > container", which IIRC only happens on bogus traces.
And that fix is already applied as a patch in Debian. So I'm really wondering what a newer upstream snapshot would bring :) Samuel
