Please discard this section. I misread it. It indeed does double the work. I'll switch the defaults and do some testing.
On Thu, 2016-04-07 at 15:25 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > I checked more on this, and this is what I found. > > With half speed: > > rrs@learner:/sys/bus/cpu/devices/cpu0$ openssl speed > Doing md4 for 3s on 16 size blocks: 4295553 md4's in 2.97s > Doing md4 for 3s on 64 size blocks: 3317236 md4's in 2.99s > Doing md4 for 3s on 256 size blocks: 1939860 md4's in 2.99s > Doing md4 for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 727015 md4's in 2.99s > Doing md4 for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 105341 md4's in 3.00s > Doing md5 for 3s on 16 size blocks: 3101894 md5's in 2.98s > Doing md5 for 3s on 64 size blocks: 2235797 md5's in 3.00s > Doing md5 for 3s on 256 size blocks: 1228928 md5's in 2.99s > Doing md5 for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 449882 md5's in 2.99s > Doing md5 for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 64689 md5's in 3.00s > Doing hmac(md5) for 3s on 16 size blocks: 2611156 hmac(md5)'s in 2.99s > Doing hmac(md5) for 3s on 64 size blocks: 1999051 hmac(md5)'s in 2.99s > Doing hmac(md5) for 3s on 256 size blocks: 1180636 hmac(md5)'s in 2.99s > Doing hmac(md5) for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 438307 hmac(md5)'s in 2.99s > Doing hmac(md5) for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 64715 hmac(md5)'s in 2.99s > Doing sha1 for 3s on 16 size blocks: 3731871 sha1's in 2.99s > Doing sha1 for 3s on 64 size blocks: 2239718 sha1's in 2.98s > Doing sha1 for 3s on 256 size blocks: 1480029 sha1's in 2.99s > Doing sha1 for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 600523 sha1's in 2.99s > Doing sha1 for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 88193 sha1's in 2.99s > Doing sha256 for 3s on 16 size blocks: 3599814 sha256's in 3.00s > Doing sha256 for 3s on 64 size blocks: 2025003 sha256's in 2.99s > Doing sha256 for 3s on 256 size blocks: 970274 sha256's in 2.99s > Doing sha256 for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 303136 sha256's in 3.00s > Doing sha256 for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 41629 sha256's in 3.00s > Doing sha512 for 3s on 16 size blocks: 2468796 sha512's in 3.00s > Doing sha512 for 3s on 64 size blocks: 2481543 sha512's in 3.00s > Doing sha512 for 3s on 256 size blocks: 1102975 sha512's in 3.00s > Doing sha512 for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 412524 sha512's in 3.00s > Doing sha512 for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 57108 sha512's in 2.99s > Doing whirlpool for 3s on 16 size blocks: 1525114 whirlpool's in 3.00s > Doing whirlpool for 3s on 64 size blocks: 859220 whirlpool's in 3.00s > Doing whirlpool for 3s on 256 size blocks: 353719 whirlpool's in 3.00s > Doing whirlpool for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 108342 whirlpool's in 3.00s > Doing whirlpool for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 14277 whirlpool's in 3.00s > Doing rmd160 for 3s on 16 size blocks: 2107100 rmd160's in 2.99s > Doing rmd160 for 3s on 64 size blocks: ^C > 2016-04-07 / 15:10:37 ♒♒♒ ☹ => 130 > > > And then with proposed full speed: > > rrs@learner:/sys/bus/cpu/devices/cpu0$ openssl speed > Doing md4 for 3s on 16 size blocks: 9392038 md4's in 2.98s > Doing md4 for 3s on 64 size blocks: 6244753 md4's in 3.00s > Doing md4 for 3s on 256 size blocks: 4142927 md4's in 3.00s > Doing md4 for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 1547502 md4's in 3.00s > Doing md4 for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 225112 md4's in 3.00s > Doing md5 for 3s on 16 size blocks: 6650710 md5's in 3.00s > Doing md5 for 3s on 64 size blocks: 4813750 md5's in 2.99s > Doing md5 for 3s on 256 size blocks: 2661605 md5's in 3.00s > Doing md5 for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 955932 md5's in 3.00s > Doing md5 for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 136823 md5's in 3.00s > Doing hmac(md5) for 3s on 16 size blocks: 5687526 hmac(md5)'s in 2.99s > Doing hmac(md5) for 3s on 64 size blocks: 4307060 hmac(md5)'s in 2.99s > Doing hmac(md5) for 3s on 256 size blocks: 2485180 hmac(md5)'s in 2.99s > Doing hmac(md5) for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 930683 hmac(md5)'s in 3.00s > Doing hmac(md5) for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 136320 hmac(md5)'s in 3.00s > Doing sha1 for 3s on 16 size blocks: 7909628 sha1's in 3.00s > Doing sha1 for 3s on 64 size blocks: 5696551 sha1's in 3.00s > Doing sha1 for 3s on 256 size blocks: 3369608 sha1's in 3.00s > Doing sha1 for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 1270917 sha1's in 2.99s > Doing sha1 for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 186625 sha1's in 3.00s > Doing sha256 for 3s on 16 size blocks: 7356203 sha256's in 2.99s > Doing sha256 for 3s on 64 size blocks: 4366052 sha256's in 2.99s > Doing sha256 for 3s on 256 size blocks: 2071203 sha256's in 2.99s > Doing sha256 for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 654961 sha256's in 3.00s > Doing sha256 for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 87773 sha256's in 2.99s > Doing sha512 for 3s on 16 size blocks: 5190576 sha512's in 3.00s > Doing sha512 for 3s on 64 size blocks: 5039911 sha512's in 3.00s > Doing sha512 for 3s on 256 size blocks: 2309995 sha512's in 2.99s > Doing sha512 for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 856088 sha512's in 2.99s > Doing sha512 for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 125533 sha512's in 2.99s > Doing whirlpool for 3s on 16 size blocks: 3397037 whirlpool's in 2.99s > Doing whirlpool for 3s on 64 size blocks: 1831035 whirlpool's in 2.99s > Doing whirlpool for 3s on 256 size blocks: 765533 whirlpool's in 3.00s > Doing whirlpool for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 228553 whirlpool's in 3.00s > Doing whirlpool for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 30228 whirlpool's in 2.99s > Doing rmd160 for 3s on 16 size blocks: 4539834 rmd160's in 2.99s > Doing rmd160 for 3s on 64 size blocks: 2733040 rmd160's in 2.99s > Doing rmd160 for 3s on 256 size blocks: 1235880 rmd160's in 3.00s > Doing rmd160 for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 387812 rmd160's in 3.00s > Doing rmd160 for 3s on 8192 size blocks: ^C > 2016-04-07 / 15:13:30 ♒♒♒ ☹ => 130 > > > There's hardly any difference in the results. Even top reports the process to > run on a single core at 100% cap, in both the cases. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
