Package: debian-handbook Version: 8.20151209 Severity: minor Tags: patch Considering the following paragraph mention Red Hat just after Canonical, it will be nice and consistent to mention Red Hat in "CULTURE".
See attached patch. You may also wish to reorder SUSE and Mandriva to make them apear in the same order. -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (98, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.4.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=ja_JP.utf-8, LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.utf-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) -- no debconf information
>From af57061033cc35c6b5e48fbad12610251dd0da20 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Osamu Aoki <[email protected]> Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 16:57:18 +0900 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Red Hat The following section mention Red Hat. So skipping here is very awkward. --- en-US/00b_foreword.xml | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/en-US/00b_foreword.xml b/en-US/00b_foreword.xml index bdce254..a4ef8e1 100644 --- a/en-US/00b_foreword.xml +++ b/en-US/00b_foreword.xml @@ -38,7 +38,8 @@ <para>Most Linux distributions are backed by a for-profit company that develops them and sells them under some kind of commercial scheme. Examples include <emphasis>Ubuntu</emphasis>, mainly - developed by <emphasis>Canonical Ltd.</emphasis>; <emphasis>Mandriva + developed by <emphasis>Canonical Ltd.</emphasis>; <emphasis>Red Hat + Enterprise Linux</emphasis>, by <emphasis>Red Hat</emphasis>; <emphasis>Mandriva Linux</emphasis>, by French company <emphasis>Mandriva SA</emphasis>; and <emphasis>Suse Linux</emphasis>, maintained and made commercially available by <emphasis>Novell</emphasis>.</para> -- 2.8.0.rc3
