On 11 April 2016 at 17:45, Michael Biebl <[email protected]> wrote: > > Which is why I'm suggesting that network-manager should be able to aware > > enough to work with either. > I don't think we want that. If arping and iputils-arping want to be > interchangable arping implementations, they should find a common interface. >
These are both 16+ year old implementations, so I think the best to hope for is that a common interface subset can be used by network-manager. Or if there is a missing (common) feature or flag that can be implemented without breaking existing behaviour. I grepped the source but did not find the actual command invocation.
