I am forwarding this mail to the texmacs developers, since I am not able to answer all of your
questions.
Frank Küster wrote:
Magnus Ekdahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ralf, what do think about upstreams suggestion on texmacs-dev to use
his Type 1 fonts instead? That solves this (and future similar)
problem(s).
This is about the part still assigned to texmacs, and I need not care
about it, correct?
Yes :)
- many warning messages such as:
TeXmacs] Trying to create ecrm10.123pk from 300 dpi
mktexpk: Mismatched mode ljfour and resolution 300; ignoring mode.
mktexpk: Running mf-nowin -progname=mf \mode:=cx; mag:=123/300; nonstopmode;
input ecrm10
They seem harmless, but texmacs should avoid them if possible.
This is due to mktexpk first guessing the wrong mode ljfour. ljfour is not
specified by texmacs though.
There is a variable TEX_HUSH that can be used to control the amount of
warning messages generated by mktexpk. But even at the quietest
setting your warning does not go away.
I am reassigning this part of your bug to the package with mktexpk (tetex-bin).
Hm, so the solution would be to make mktexpk guess the right mode.
Likely, judging from the mktexpk manual (kpathsea) it is not easy to predict
the effect of choosing
different modes though.
What
would be right?
Good question, the output the mode that is actually used is cx. I cannot see that cx mode leads to a
problem, but this is really an upstream question. I have mailed a question to texmacs-dev, hopefully
they will answer this question.
/Magnus Ekdahl
