Enrico Zini wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 06:13:40PM +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote:
>
>
>
>>>I would prefer, if possible, a prominent notice on the package
>>>description stating that the progsreiserfs tools are unofficial.
>>>Perhaps something as simple as "progsreiserfs - Third-party
>>>alternative tools for manipulating ReiserFS filesystems" or something
>>>like that
>>>What do you think?
>>>
>>>
>>Perfect. If you don't mind sponsoring the upload (since my AM hasn't
>>finished with me yet), we can do it as soon as possible. Any additional
>>suggestions?
>>
>>
>
>This was lost in time somehow, but the two packages are still there,
>similar enough to cause confusion.
>
>If you're still up for the update, please send me at your convenience
>the package to upload attached to a signed e-mail, and I'll do the
>upload.
>
>
An updated version of progsreiserfs, closing *all* outstanding bugs is
on its way.
However, i will file an RC bug against it as soon as possible so as to
ensure that it doesn't transition to testing until its stability has
been proved.
Moreover, and seeing that upstream seems a bit 'dead', i might consider
asking that it be removed sometime before the release.
Thanks.
Cheers,
J.L.
