Control: tags -1 moreinfo On Fri, 2016-04-29 at 19:26:50 +0100, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote: > 2016-04-29 12:43 Guillem Jover: > > Does the new arch satisfy: > > > > > > <https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Dpkg/FAQ#Q._Can_we_add_support_for_a_new_dpkg_architecture.3F> > > Sorry, I forgot to comment on that (although I knew about it):
No problem! > - there is support in config for quite a while: > > > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/config.git/commit/?id=576c839acca0e082e536fd27568b90a446ce5b96 > > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/config.git/commit/?id=b576fa87c140b824466ef1638e945e87dc5c0343 > > If you think that this can be improved, I can communicate this to the > relevant parties. As mentioned on IRC, this looks fine. > - the support in the toolchain projects has not been merged yet, > althought it's been planned for some time and can start at any moment > > I understand if you don't want to enable support yet for this reason, > I can ping the bug when that happens. Yes, I'd rather wait. I'm marking the bug as moreinfo, please remove the tag when the upstreaming is complete. > - it can work with both endianness, but so far the expectations is that > everybody will use little-endian, thus the proposed name without -el > suffix. I wouldn't oppose to add -el explicitly. Nah, w/o is fine. > - anything missing? Not that I see right now, no. :) Thanks, Guillem
