Fair enough. Building updated package right now. Cheers, -- Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> Knot DNS (https://www.knot-dns.cz/) – a high-performance DNS server Vše pro chleba (https://vseprochleba.cz) – Potřeby pro pečení chleba všeho druhu
On Wed, May 11, 2016, at 15:49, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 03:11:26PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote: > > > src:php5 is going to be killed from testing soon and it's not going to > > be part of next stable release. Do you still think it's worth updating > > it for source-only uploads? I know that you put some effort into this, > > but I am keeping php5 in unstable just for the sake of security- and > > proposed-updates right now (and there are still some r-deps that needs > > to be fixed before I can kill it from ). > > This is not only for source-only uploads, this is also a QA issue. > > I'm checking all packages for "dpkg-buildpackage -A". This one makes > me to waste 80 minutes of CPU time only to ensure that "dpkg-buildpackage > -A" > works, so if the question is "does it worth to fix this in stretch while > the package still exists?" I would answer "definitely yes". > > In other words: the upload could be source-only for you, but as far as > I have it in my list of packages to check, it is certainly not > source-only for me. > > I could of course exclude the package from the list of packages to > check, but I would much prefer to reserve such list for packages that > make the autobuilder to hang, like this one which also hangs > the autobuilder from reproducible builds people: > > https://reproducible.debian.net/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/tbb.html > > > Moreover, the patch is very small and it should be very easy to check > for correctness (otherwise, I would probably not have bothered to > create it in the first place). > > Thanks.
