Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/Bumblebee-Project/Bumblebee/issues/652 Control: tags -1 pending
On 26 April 2016 at 15:13, <ydir...@free.fr> wrote: > No I just reported it to the bts as I saw it I've sent a patch upstream to ignore the DRM error. Apparently it's due to DRM, see: https://github.com/Bumblebee-Project/Bumblebee/issues/652 I'll also backport it as a patch since it's a very annoying red herring. Besides this, do you have other issues with Bumblebee or is it working? Kind regards, Luca Boccassi > ----- Mail original ----- >> De: "Luca Boccassi" <luca.bocca...@gmail.com> >> À: ydir...@free.fr, 822...@bugs.debian.org >> Envoyé: Mardi 26 Avril 2016 11:28:29 >> Objet: Re: Bug#822665: bumblebee: reports wrong error message from Xorg log >> >> Control: tags -1 upstream >> >> On Tue, 2016-04-26 at 10:17 +0200, ydir...@free.fr wrote: >> > Package: bumblebee >> > Version: 3.2.1-10 >> > >> > When trying to use bumblebee those days, the reported failure is: >> > >> > $ optirun xterm >> > [42519.843834] [ERROR]Cannot access secondary GPU - error: [XORG] >> > (EE) /dev/dri/card0: failed to set DRM interface version 1.4: >> > Permission denied >> > >> > [42519.843864] [ERROR]Aborting because fallback start is disabled. >> > $ >> > >> > Looking in Xorg.8.log, we can see: >> > >> > [ 42519.553] (II) xfree86: Adding drm device (/dev/dri/card1) >> > [ 42519.840] (II) xfree86: Adding drm device (/dev/dri/card0) >> > [ 42519.840] (EE) /dev/dri/card0: failed to set DRM interface >> > version 1.4: Permission denied >> > [ 42519.841] (--) PCI:*(0:1:0:0) 10de:139b:1462:1139 rev 162, Mem @ >> > 0xa2000000/16777216, 0xc0000000/268435456, 0xd0000000/33554432, >> > I/O @ 0x00004000/128, BIOS @ 0x????????/524288 >> > ... >> > [ 42519.843] (II) [drm] nouveau interface version: 1.3.1 >> > [ 42519.843] (EE) Unknown chipset: NV117 >> > [ 42519.843] (EE) No devices detected. >> > [ 42519.843] (EE) >> > Fatal server error: >> > [ 42519.843] (EE) no screens found(EE) >> > >> > The "permission denied" is quite strange, as the device does have >> > the ACL allowing RW for the current user. >> > But anyway that card is already used by :0, could it be that the >> > error code returned by the DRI device is >> > just wrong (EPERM instead of EBUSY) ? >> > >> > Anyway, that error does not appear to be fatal to Xorg, which does >> > list the second one as fatal, >> > and incidentally that error message looks like a much more >> > understandable reason >> >> Hi, >> >> Yes unfortunately very often bumblebee errors are a bit misleading or >> hard to interpret :-( >> Have you reported this upstream? >> >> Kind regards, >> Luca Boccassi >>