On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 04:14:14PM +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > Anyway I guess my frustration is more about how packages are being removed in > general -- not just this particular one.
umh? Very quick removals are very nice and useful. What's wrong with
them?
I see how this particular case might have caused some troubles, but
really, otherwise they are quite cool.
> Maybe we need some sort of delay and wider announcement for packages that are
> tagged for removal to give prospective maintainers opportunity for
> adoption... Or maybe removal could begin with RC-critical bug to drop
> packages from "testing" first...
One of them (I usually go the RC bug way) is usually (!= always) what
happens for RoQA, but for ROM this doesn't make much sense most of the
time...
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
