On Tue, 2016 May 24 20:47+0200, Arthur de Jong wrote:
>
> I'm not really sure what triggers it but I also see this in the logs a
> lot. I just ignore it. It could be that nscd makes it more difficult
> to trigger because it sometimes also caches negative hits.
> Furthermore, the application may be caching it.

Ah, yes, that makes sense. I'm using nscd as well.

> > I claim ignorance as to why this request occurs (is this really
> > supposed to return a list of all users?)
>
> No, I'm pretty sure it is some sort of lookup that is meant to return
> nu users at all or a misconfiguration somewhere.

If I can find what is doing this, should the behavior be
considered a bug?

(I'd be happy to file a report, as long as the maintainer is not likely
to respond with "working as designed, closing.")

> To not report it as an invalid name you could set validnames to
>
> /^[a-z0-9._@$()*]([a-z0-9._@$() \\~-]*[a-z0-9._@$()~-])?$/i
>
> but that is a bit ugly and it results in a useless LDAP search
> each time.

Yes, I'd want to avoid the extra network chatter (and server load, once
you're talking about many clients).

Reply via email to