Hello Mattia,
Thank you for the notice. But we replied all the emails from Debian in time.
The latest one is attached. I do not know why they were not accepted.
Sincerely,
Di-Shi Sun.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mattia Rizzolo [mailto:mat...@debian.org]
Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2016 6:53 AM
To: sub...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#825701: should osptoolkit be removed from Debian?
Source: osptoolkit
Version: 3.4.2-1.2
Severity: serious
This package:
* has very few users https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=osptoolkit
* one unanswered RC bug #804623
* no answer to the other bugs #555877 #786975
* actually you never bothered replying even to the closed bugs #713639
#761782
* 2 NMU
* last (AND ONLY!) maintainer upload in 2008. This is not how this is
supposed to work, sorry. Uploading a package to the archive means
committing to maintain it.
* currently it just FTBFS.
* blocking openssl decruft
Given so, I'm going to ask for removal in about one week if nobody blocks me
before.
RM: osptoolkit -- RoQA; RC-buggy; FTBFS; unmaintained
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Sebastian,
Thank you very much for the notice. We have put the update plan on the schedule.
Regards,
Di-Shi Sun.
-----Original Message-----
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [mailto:sebast...@breakpoint.cc]
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 5:19 AM
To: di-...@transnexus.com
Subject: osptoolkit in Debian
Hello,
noticed that Debian has v3.4.2 of osptoolkit which will not be part of next
Debian stable release.
If I got this correct, then you prepared the last package and you are involved
in upstream development. v4.11.1 seems to be the current version. Care to fix
your package and/or provide a new version of it?
While browsing through the current source the package, I noticed that you use
TLSv1_client_method(). You should be using
SSLv23_client_method() instead because the former gives you _only_ v1 protocol
while the latter gives you multiple selections and as of today up to TLSv1.2
Sebastian
--- End Message ---
