On Tue, 2016-04-26 at 17:56 +0200, Tormod Volden wrote: > > Well it's the same case as with gnome-screensaver, I thought. > > Both can use the screensaver modules provided by xscreensaver > I should probably remove the Enhance for gnome-screensaver.
Or that... and tell the gnome-screensaver guys, that they should Recommend/Suggest your packages directly. In any case however, I think that the dependencies(i.e. Enhances), at least on the xscreensaver packages) should be the same for all possible users (at least, cinnamon-screensaver, gnome-screensaver and mate- screensaver) btw: I just noticed, that you also mention gnome-screensaver in the package descriptions... I think that should also go away then, since gnome-screensaver is in no way more special than e.g. cinnamon- screensaver (or possible others like mate-screensaver). > > > Wouldn't it be better to have cinnamon-screensaver Suggest these > > > packages? I guess cinnamon-screensaver Recommends xscreensaver- > > > data > > > and xscreensaver-gl already. > > Well they recommend it already... so no need for a Suggests. > Note that I was talking about two other packages here. I would think > all 4 should be Suggested. At least in the current version they recommend all 4... I personally have no strong opinion on whether the -extra packages should only be suggested... Cheers, Chris.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
