Josselin Mouette: > Hi Niels, > > Le lundi 30 mai 2016 à 19:32 +0000, Niels Thykier a écrit : >> Can you confirm that this dependency on gconf2 is now unnecessary? At >> first glance I cannot see a need for it now that the autoscripts have >> been removed. > > Unless the functionality is optional in the package (which is the case > of pidgin), the gconf2 dependency is still needed. Not because of the > scripts anymore, but because functionally, a binary shipped with gconf > schemas will usually require them to execute. > > Otherwise, you might end up with the binary aborting on startup. > > Cheers, >
Ok, thanks. Ari, the best I can then offer would be a switch for skipping the gconf2 dependency (i.e. an opt-out). Is that still interesting? Thanks, ~Niels
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature