On Mon, 30 May 2016 at 22:36 Mattia Rizzolo <mat...@debian.org> wrote:
> I think RM of this package should be seriously considered: > > * NPOASR > * FTBFS > * RC-buggy with no answers in 6 months > * 2 NMUs > * should be superseded by -3.x > * very low popcon > > RM; percona-xtradb-cluster-galera-2.x -- RoQA; NPOASR; FTBFS; RC-buggy; > unmaintained; low popcon > +1 (to be honest I though I had already done this when we removed the main percona-xtradb-cluster-5.5 package from the archive) > >
