On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 06:17:41PM +0200, Fabian Wolff wrote: > tmp-tt-table.c: $(srcdir)/tag_tree.list tag_tree_build > # gcc -E tag_tree.list does not work, so use a .c name > -rm -f tmp-t1.c > cp $(srcdir)/tag_tree.list tmp-t1.c > $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -E tmp-t1.c > ./tmp-tag-tree-build1.tmp > LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:$(LD_LIBRARY_PATH) ./tag_tree_build > -s -i tmp-tag-tree-build1.tmp -o tmp-tt-table.c > > blhc produces the following output when fed with the resulting build > log: > > CPPFLAGS missing (-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2): # gcc -E tag_tree.list does not work, > so use a .c name > CPPFLAGS missing (-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2): # gcc -E tag_attr.list does not work, > so use a .c name > CPPFLAGS missing (-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2): # gcc -E tag_attr_ext.list does not > work, so use a .c name > CPPFLAGS missing (-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2): # gcc -E tag_tree_ext.list does not > work, so use a .c name > > These are obviously false positives since the referred lines are not > actual calls to gcc but merely comments in the Makefile.
Hello, Thanks for the report, this should be fixed in 0.06 [1]. Regards Simon [1]: https://ruderich.org/simon/gitweb/?p=blhc/blhc.git;a=commitdiff;h=a0f80b21eb2a1cc3bb306a68fb7a3beed1df9072 -- + privacy is necessary + using gnupg http://gnupg.org + public key id: 0x92FEFDB7E44C32F9
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
