Hello Eduard, On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 06:14:27PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: > * Helge Kreutzmann [Sun, Jun 05 2016, 04:37:59PM]: > > > > > I have seen a similar report from Ubuntu recently... probably this > > > > > needs > > > > > to be reassigned to glibc ASAP. > > > > > > > > That is probably beyond my knowledge[1], could you reassign? I'm willing > > > > to test and provide information, no problem on that. > > > > > > > > Greetings > > > > > > > > Helge > > > > > > > > [1] Not the commands to reassign, but finding the right package and > > > > giving the right information for the bug to be proccessed. > > > > > > Not sure yet - as said, it smells like a problem of getaddrinfo which > > > would be libc6. But first, can you confirm there is no bindaddress > > > directive anywhere in other conf files? What does: > > > > > > $ /usr/lib/apt-cacher-ng/acngtool cfgdump | grep --color bind > > > > > > print? > > > > root@samd:/etc# /usr/lib/apt-cacher-ng/acngtool cfgdump | grep --color bind > > root@samd:/etc# > > > > Also unchanged if I reboot. > > Sure, this will be unchanged, I just wanted to be sure that it isn't > trying to resolve an interface name. Things start getting ugly now. I > prepared a minimal test case, could you run it? See attachment, just > "g++ addrinfo.cc" to compile, ./a.out to execute.
The output is:
Found socket, type: 2
Found socket, type: 10
Greetings
Helge
--
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann [email protected]
Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
