Hi Am 06.06.2016 um 09:34 schrieb Luca BRUNO: > On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 21:58:54 +0200 Michael Biebl <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Am 05.06.2016 um 17:59 schrieb Dmitry Smirnov: >>> Could we introduce raw "systemd-sysusers" binary ASAP to fix "rkt" please? >> >> The size is a concern, and we mentioned this before. >> This really is a wishlist bug, so bumping the severity is not justified. > > In a previous follow-up I proposed an alternative if size bloat is a concern: > adding "systemd-sysusers" to the "systemd-container" binary package (possibly > without enabling it). > > Are there other downsides wrt this approach?
I don't really think systemd-sysusers fits the scope of the systemd-container package and a separate binary package for systemd-sysusers seems like overkill. Now, regarding my concerns: The size increase is one (which will affect everyone if we ship it s part of the systemd package). More importantly, enabling a new feature means we'll have to support it in the future as people will eventually make use of it. So we better have a good reason to turn it on. Maybe I missed it, but I haven't quite understood yet, why rkt has a hard (and not a soft) depenency on systemd-sysusers. The upstream bug report that was referenced earlier wasn't really enlightening in that regard. As for the bug severity ping pong: sorry for that, this wasn't really necessary and is just off-putting. In the end it doesn't really change anything though in the issue at hand. Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
