reassign 348549 cpufrequtils stop On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 12:59:11AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote: > Package: cpufreqd > Version: 2.0.0-1 > Severity: wishlist > > The user doesn't know why this doesn't work: > > # lsmod|grep cpu > cpufreq_ondemand 6012 0 > cpufreq_stats 4644 0 > freq_table 4452 1 cpufreq_stats > cpufreq_userspace 4412 0 > # cpufreq-info -g > # cpufreq-set -g ondemand > wrong, unknown or unhandled CPU?# > # cpufreq-set -g ondemand -c 0 > wrong, unknown or unhandled CPU?# > # cpufreq-info > cpufrequtils 0.3: cpufreq-info (C) Dominik Brodowski 2004 > Report errors and bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED], please. > analyzing CPU 0: > no or unknown cpufreq driver is active on this CPU
you're missing the cpufreq driver for your cpu. That's exactely what cpufreq-info says. > # uname -a > Linux jidanni2 2.6.12-1-686 #1 Tue Sep 27 12:52:50 JST 2005 i686 GNU/Linux I assume this is a _cpufrequtils_ wishlist bug, not cpufreqd. > BTW, > http://www.mk-stuff.de/artikel-linux_on_an_ibm_thinkpad_r50e.php#freq > finds "no savings while decreasing the CPU frequency. Reason enough for > me to deactivate all CPU-Frequencing options in the Kernel". Therefore > no need to bother with the CPU. and?? it's known, throttling the cpu (no voltage scaling) doesn't save energy. Here's a nice presentation you may find useful: http://www.brodo.de/linux/lt05/presentation.pdf Look at page 9. > BTW, > In /usr/share/doc/cpufrequtils/README.Debian say "in" not "to". where exactly? thanks. > And where is it documented what speed 0 means in the /etc file? in /etc/defaults/cpufrequtils (I assume you submitted this bug to the wrong package). Dan, care to put some light on what this bug is for? :) thanks -- mattia :wq! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
