Hi Kurt,
any new on integrating this.
I thought dropping the one line we agreed could be done on you applying it.
Did you wait for me to create a line for the leap second thing or are you
waiting on me for something else related to it I didn't realize?
Christian Ehrhardt
Software Engineer, Ubuntu Server
Canonical Ltd
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Christian Ehrhardt <
christian.ehrha...@canonical.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Kurt Roeckx <k...@roeckx.be> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 10:09:21AM -0500, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
>>
>> I think this line shouldn't be ignored:
>> ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ ntpd\[[0-9]+\]: receive: Unexpected
>> origin timestamp from ([0-9.]{7,15}|[0-9a-fA-F:.]{4,39})
>>
>> But it does seem to show up more than it should.
>>
>> I added it as it showed up in the most basic things I did.
> But you are right, we shouldn't ignore this one.
> I found that it is also recommended to monitor for that line (high
> frequent) for https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-7705
>
> So please feel free to just drop this line from the file.
> I wonder thou why it appears in basic execution so often (well different
> bug then)
>
