Hello Hans, hello texlive list, please take my apologies for bringing this up, but it seems I need to. According to mreadme.pdf, the documentation is under a different license than the code, with a "currently" attached to that statement. Unfortunately, the license chosen for the documentation does not allow inclusion in TeXLive (and Debian, hence the other Cc).
The problem is the prohibition to use it for commercial purposes. This is explained later as ,---- | The non--commercial part is mostly a safeguard. We don't mind if user | groups distribute printed copies, publish (parts of) manuals and/or if | authors use example code in manuals and books about ConTEXt. `---- However, if a bookshop like Lehmann's in Germany creates TeXLive (or Debian) CD-ROMs and sells them, this is commercial use - even if the price is hardly more than the production costs, and even if DANTE, the german user group, gets a bunch of them for free. After all, the purpose is to bring customers into the bookshop in the hope they also buy something else. On the other hand, I understand that Pragma wants to prevent anyone from printing and selling a book or booklet with the documentation. But I assume that it would be possible to do this without such restrictions. What do you think? As for a practical solution, maybe simply using the GPL for the documentation would maybe already do the trick, since the publisher would have to provide the source code on the same medium, i.e. written. I assume it's even possible to declare that the rights granted by the GPL do not apply to print, or more specifically, to state that the copyright holder grants and restricts the same rights for any digital representation (like a PDF file) that the GPL gives for "object code", but not for any printed representation which isn't covered by the GPL, anyway. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
