[Chris Lamb] > IIRC it was deemed to be low-priority from an LTS point of view so/and > I could not justify spending more time on it then. Happy to look again > if there is a more urgent requirement.
Right. It is still unsolved in stable, testing, unstable and upstream, and the second oldest open CVE on my stable laptop (the oldest is in ruby, and pending a stable update), so I would like to see it fixed to reduce the number of known security problems on my machine. :) Can not say much about the priority or urgency related to other issues, though. :) I've poked upstream too, and hope some solution will materialise. -- Happy hacking Petter Reinholdtsen
