Hello Chris, On Thu, 14 Jul 2016 21:12:09 +0200 Chris Lamb <[email protected]> wrote:
> Source: minidlna > Version: 1.1.5+dfsg-3 > Whilst working on the "reproducible builds" effort [0], we noticed > that minidlna could not be built reproducibly. > > Patch attached. > > [0] https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds +- [with_osver="$withval"],[with_osver="$(uname -r)"]) ++ [with_osver="$withval"],[with_osver="Debian GNU/Linux"]) According to https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/minidlna.html it has now problem with reproducible builds, isn't it? We have the following line in debian/rules: override_dh_auto_configure: dh_auto_configure -- --with-os-version=$(shell cut -d" " -f1 /etc/issue.net) And I believe that parsing /etc/issue.net or lsb_release is a little bit better, because packages from Ubuntu or any other derivatives should not have "Debian" inside it's version (or description). -- Best regards, Alexander Gerasiov Contacts: e-mail: [email protected] Homepage: http://gerasiov.net Skype: gerasiov PGP fingerprint: 04B5 9D90 DF7C C2AB CD49 BAEA CA87 E9E8 2AAC 33F1
