Dear Christoph and Elena.

Since the original wotsap is not maintained any more, but there are
quite a few patches that could be applied and improvements that could be
made, I decided to fork it and begin again its development here:

  https://github.com/giomasce/wotsap

Actually, I will not have a lot of time for it, but hopefully enough to
fix the current most outstanding issues. I will also update the Debian
package after this repository.

Il 11/02/2013 20:36, Christoph Egger ha scritto:
> Hi!
> 
>   The next .wot files (generated every weekend) should now work again
> with wotsap, I've commented out the relevant part of the generation
> script causing the problems.
> 
>   I'd still really appreciate if wotsap will be changed to handle .wot
> files as the bzip2 compressed ar archives they are. Would also be cool
> to figure out if we can add an extra component to the archive in a way
> that does not break wotsap (as the problem with 4byte short IDs only is
> still unresolved) or if we need to keep both formats in parallel (and as
> a consequence have more freedom in how the "new" wots will look like)

In theory it should, but there may be bug. I agree that wotsap should be
updated to support longer IDs (and possibly also the whole fingerprint).
 If you want we can discuss the file format changes to support this, so
that you can apply them on the .wot generator and I on wotsap.

I see two main alternatives:

 * The file "keys" is extended to 8 or 20 bytes record. This is the
sanest thing, but it is also backward-incompatible. The WOTVERSION
number should be bumped to 0.3, old clients could not use new files and
new clients could not use old files (unless they retain compatibility,
of course).

 * Old files are kept as they are, but another file (e.g., "longkeys")
is added, which contains 4 or 16 bytes record: each record is the part
that must be pasted before the corresponding "keys" record in order to
have the long ID. This is backward-compatible, but really ugly in itself.

I tend to prefer the first alternative, especially if you can keep
providing 0.2 .wots for some time after the change.

Let me know what you think.

Have a nice day, Giovanni.
-- 
Giovanni Mascellani <g.mascell...@gmail.com>
PhD Student - Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, Italy

http://poisson.phc.unipi.it/~mascellani

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to