tag 310495 forwarded wishlist
thanks

On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Teemu Likonen wrote:
> I don't mind moving it to the wishlist. I don't use "par" anymore - I 
> can't. But, this is kind of becoming a bug because Linux distributions 
> have moved towards UTF-8 locale and there aren't many languages that 
> can be written with ascii codes 0 - $7f. In Unicode's UTF-8 encoding 
> all the other codes ($80 - $10ffff) need 2 to 4 bytes. So, as "par" is 
> mainly for reformatting text with human languages, it has become pretty 
> useless nowadays as Unicode and UTF-8 has come.

I agree that migrating programs that support char handling to those
that have UTF-8 char handling would be a good thing.

So I sent the enclosed mail to the upstream author. However, I don't
hold out too much hope since the upstream packages have not changed in
about four years!

Regards,

Kapil.
--

========message sent to upstram author====
Hello,
 
Thanks for the program "par" which I have been using for a while now
via its Debian package. Recently a bug has been filed against the
Debian package of "par" for its inability to handle multi-byte
characters (http://bugs.debian.org/310495 for details). Specifically,
in UTF-8 encoding many bytes make up a single "unicode character" and
this disturbs "par"'s count of word length while right-justifying
text.

Do you have plans to incorporate the handling of such text in "par"
at some point? Alternatively, do you think that this is a
feasible/worthwhile addition for someone else to work on (I might be
able to find someone---may be even myself)?
 
Thanks and regards,
 
Kapil.
--

===========================================

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to