Package: iptables Version: 1.6.0-3 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer,
the "adequate" QA tool reports these for the /sbin/xtables-multi executable: iptables: bin-or-sbin-binary-requires-usr-lib-library /sbin/xtables-multi => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libip4tc.so.0 iptables: bin-or-sbin-binary-requires-usr-lib-library /sbin/xtables-multi => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libip6tc.so.0 iptables: bin-or-sbin-binary-requires-usr-lib-library /sbin/xtables-multi => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxtables.so.11 I guess moving xtables-multi under /usr/bin should fix them. Thanks, Antonio -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (900, 'unstable'), (500, 'unstable-debug') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.6.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=it_IT.utf8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages iptables depends on: ii libc6 2.23-4 ii libip4tc0 1.6.0-3 ii libip6tc0 1.6.0-3 ii libiptc0 1.6.0-3 ii libnetfilter-conntrack3 1.0.5-1 ii libnfnetlink0 1.0.1-3 ii libxtables11 1.6.0-3 iptables recommends no packages. Versions of packages iptables suggests: ii kmod 22-1.1 -- no debconf information -- Antonio Ospite http://ao2.it A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?