> Violating a should directive is not RC. Indeed, which is why I added:
> and forcing GNOME and GTK3 dependency creep on GTK2 applications seems > severe enough in my opinion. > Besides, it's questionable if the dependency mentioned in this bug > report even violates this particular section of the policy. Well I sure made my best to make a good case for it! You're not really discussing that case. On the other hand, I'm still waiting to hear or find out explanations *for* that dependency. (Saying "the package is small and only provides the directory structure" in the changelog is not an explanation why.) -- Pierre Ynard "Une âme dans un corps, c'est comme un dessin sur une feuille de papier."
