X-Debbugs-CC: cl...@debian.org, aure...@debian.org, adcon...@0c3.net, 
sthiba...@debian.org

El dj 11 de 08 de 2016 a les 21:55 +0200, Aurelien Jarno va escriure:
> On 2016-08-11 21:32, Javier Serrano Polo wrote:
> > libc-bin is tagged essential since 2.13-10. Old systems based on Squeeze
> > can work without libc-bin, with a dpkg that does not require ldconfig.
> 
> No they can't. In squeeze, the binaries from libc-bin were included in
> libc6. The package has been split as part of the switch to multiarch.

This is not correct:
https://archive.debian.net/squeeze/libc-bin

> > Could anyone explain why libc-bin is essential?
> 
> Because it provides binaries and configuration files essential for the
> system: ldconfig, getent, ld.so.conf, nsswitch.conf, C.UTF-8 locale, etc.

These elements are very useful, but a system based on Squeeze can work
without them. Is there any other reason in a Sid system?

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to